By Ephraim Agbo
For decades, Africa has been like a player in a rigged casino—no matter how well we play, the house always wins. Western aid? Given with one hand, taken away with the other. Trade agreements? Structured to benefit wealthier nations. Global governance? A system where Africa is invited to the table but only gets to eat crumbs.
And now, with Trump slashing USAID funding, pulling out of climate commitments, and flexing his influence over South Africa’s land policies, Africa is once again left wondering: How did we let ourselves get here?
The Reality of the Global System: A Game We Were Never Meant to Win
Let’s face it—Africa was never meant to thrive under the current international system. This system was designed to keep Africa dependent while wealthier nations maintain their dominance.
- Foreign Aid: Given generously, but with strings attached. You want development funding? Adjust your policies to fit our interests.
- Trade Rules: When Africa exports raw materials, it gets pennies. But when those same materials are refined in Western countries, they are sold back to Africa at exorbitant prices.
- Global Finance: Loans are offered, but with crushing interest rates and economic conditions that stifle real growth. The debt trap is real.
This is why Trump’s recent policy shifts shouldn’t just be seen as an act of abandonment but as an opportunity for Africa to finally stop playing by their rules.
Foreign Aid: A Blessing or a Trap?
For years, USAID funding has kept Africa’s development wheels turning. But at what cost? When the Trump administration decided to cut USAID staffing from over 10,000 to 294, it sent a message: We helped you when it suited us, but now we have other priorities.
It’s a harsh reminder that aid was never about charity. It was about control. The moment a nation or continent becomes too dependent on it, it loses its power to negotiate on its own terms. So, maybe it’s time we ask: Was foreign aid ever truly for our benefit? Or was it a tool to ensure Africa never gained full independence?
The Climate Crisis: The Injustice Continues
Climate change is one of the greatest injustices of our time. Africa contributes the least to global carbon emissions but faces the worst effects—droughts, floods, and food insecurity. The Paris Climate Agreement was supposed to help level the playing field by ensuring that the biggest polluters (Western nations) provided financial support to help vulnerable countries cope.
But Trump’s decision to withdraw from the agreement exposes the real issue: When push comes to shove, Africa is always left to fend for itself. Wealthy nations have built their economies by polluting the planet, yet when it’s time to clean up, they conveniently step back and expect Africa to deal with the consequences alone.
Trump vs. South Africa: Who Really Owns Africa’s Land?
Trump’s recent threat to cut all funding to South Africa over its land reform policies is perhaps the most telling of all. Think about it—why does an American president feel entitled to dictate land ownership policies in a sovereign African country?
The answer is simple: Because Africa is still seen as property of the West. Even in 2025, African nations are not fully free to make their own policies without fearing financial retaliation. This is why economic independence is no longer a choice—it’s a necessity.
So, What’s Africa’s Next Move?
The current international system is not designed for Africa to win. If we keep relying on aid, accepting unfair trade deals, and waiting for Western approval to act, we will remain in the cycle of dependency.
Africa has two choices:
- Break free from the dependency model. Strengthen intra-African trade, invest in self-sufficiency, and stop waiting for Western handouts.
- Continue playing by their rules. Keep hoping that a “kinder” U.S. president or European leader will come along and be more generous.
The question is no longer whether the global system is fair—it’s about whether Africa will finally stop waiting for permission to control its own destiny.
So, Africa, what will it be? Independence, or another decade of politely asking, “May we please have a little more?”
No comments:
Post a Comment